Corporate social responsibility has received an increasing amount of attention from practitioners and scholars alike in recent years. However, very little is known about whether or how corporate social responsibility affects employees. Because employees social psychology aronson 9th edition pdf primary stakeholders who directly contribute to the success of the company, understanding employee reactions to corporate social responsibility may help answer lingering questions about the potential effects of corporate social responsibility on firms as well as illuminate some of the processes responsible for them.
To begin our chapter, we provide a brief history of scholarship on corporate social responsibility and highlight some of the major challenges researchers in this area currently face. We then discuss why corporate social responsibility may represent a special opportunity to influence employees’ general impression of their company. Next, we identify four distinct paths through which corporate social responsibility may affect employees’ relationship with their company that correspond to four universal psychological needs: security, self-esteem, belongingness, and a meaningful existence. Finally, we offer an agenda for micro-level research on corporate social responsibility.
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution. Two experiments are performed to test hypotheses derived from commodity theory. Commodity theory promotes a psychological conceptualization of traditionally economic variables such as supply, demand and utility. The results suggest that the theory is valid only for attractive products.
The results again suggest that commodity theory is valid only for subjects attracted to the good, and only for the restricted attainability situation. For subjects not attracted to the product field no treatment effects were found. Commodity theory makes no clear prediction of the effects of unattainability, so reactance theory was used to predict the effects of this variable. The hypothesis that an unattainable good is valued more than an attainable good had to be rejected. A possible explanation based on the occurrence of frustration in this condition is discussed. Verhallen is Assistant Professor at the Department of Economic Psychology of the Tilburg University, The Netherlands.
Which i consider more like a religion, since believers might be embarrassed to say so publicly. In spite of everything, a year after Abraham Maslow became the president of the American Psychological Association. By the end, a certain Gordon. Before one’s conscience and before God.
Verhallen, Katholieke Hogeschool, G 711, Postbus 90153, 5000 LE Tilburg, The Netherlands. 1982 Published by Elsevier B. Changes must be reviewed before being displayed on this page. He stressed the importance of focusing on the positive qualities in people, as opposed to treating them as a “bag of symptoms. 2002, ranked Maslow as the tenth most cited psychologist of the 20th century. Maslow was the oldest of seven children and was classed as “mentally unstable” by a psychologist. Czarist persecution in the early 20th century.